Skip to content

AI-powered test engineering

Test every change.
Ship with confidence.

BXVTech brings test generation, autonomous execution, failure diagnosis, test maintenance, and release verification into one intelligent workflow.

Designed for modern web applications, APIs, and continuous delivery workflows.

bxvtech / acme-commerce / test-intelligence
Interactive preview · Demo data

Test Intelligence

Workspace: Acme Commerce (illustrative)

Analysis complete
Run
RUN-4298
Pull request
PR #1842
Branch
feature/checkout-improvements
Env
staging
Journey progress5 / 6 steps evaluated
  1. 01Open storefrontPassed
  2. 02Sign inPassed
  3. 03Add productPassed
  4. 04Apply discountNeeds review
  5. 05Submit paymentFailed
  6. 06Verify order confirmationInvestigating

Execution timeline

Checkout regression

Failed
Endpoint
POST /api/checkout
Observed
HTTP 500
Expected
HTTP 200
Journey
Checkout
Source
services/payments/checkout.ts
Change
PR #1842

AI explanation · simulated

The checkout request returned HTTP 500 after payment submission. Review the changed checkout handler, payment-service logs, and response validation.

Network

GET /cart200
POST /discount200
POST /checkout500

Evidence

  • Request trace
  • Console events (3)
  • Changed files (3)

Fits the way your team ships software.

Connect testing workflows with the tools your engineering team already uses.

  • Source control

    GitHub · GitLab · Planned

  • Issue tracking

    Jira · Linear · Planned

  • Team communication

    Slack · Planned

  • CI/CD

    Pipelines · Planned

  • Browser automation

    Web apps · Planned

  • REST APIs

    Endpoints · Planned

The test maintenance problem

Automation shouldn't create more work than it removes.

Traditional test automation can become expensive to maintain as applications, selectors, workflows, and dependencies change.

Guest checkoutdrafting
Saved card paymentbacklog
Expired couponbacklog
Address validationbacklog

Test creation slows teams down

Writing, updating, and expanding test cases manually makes it harder to keep pace with product changes.

#checkout-btn.primary
[data-test="pay-now"]
12 tests reference old selector

Small changes break brittle tests

UI updates, selector changes, and shifting workflows can create maintenance work and noisy failures.

Application code
Test logic
Test data
Environment

Failures lack the right context

Engineers need to understand whether a failure comes from application code, test logic, data, or the environment.

The BXVTech workflow

From requirements to verified releases.

Bring the core testing lifecycle into one workflow, with engineers retaining control over execution, repairs, and release decisions.

  1. 01

    Understand

    Interpret requirements, user stories, application behavior, and code changes to identify important testing scenarios.

    US-112 Checkout
    → Checkout journey
    → Discount journey
  2. 02

    Generate

    Create candidate test cases from supported inputs, including natural-language requirements and application workflows.

    “Users can apply a code”
    1. add item
    2. apply SAVE20
    3. assert total
  3. 03

    Execute

    Run browser and API tests in configured environments and collect execution evidence.

    chromium · staging
    POST /checkout
    ← 200 OK 312ms
  4. 04

    Diagnose

    Correlate test output with available logs, network responses, browser events, and code changes to investigate failures.

    HTTP 500
    + console error
    + PR #1842 diff
  5. 05

    Repair

    Identify maintenance opportunities and propose safe test updates for review or controlled application. Repairs change tests — never application code.

    - #pay-btn
    + role=button[Pay]
    awaiting review
  6. 06

    Verify

    Rerun relevant tests, record outcomes, and provide evidence that helps teams assess release readiness.

    ✓ rerun 4 tests
    ✓ evidence stored
    • 1 open item

AI failure diagnosis

Understand why a test failed.

Move beyond a red test result. Bring execution evidence, application responses, browser events, and available change context together to investigate the likely cause.

TEST-218 · failure investigation
Demo data

TEST-218

Checkout with discount

  1. Open storefront
  2. Sign in
  3. Add product
  4. Apply SAVE20
  5. Submit payment
Failed at step 5

Failure investigation

Application error — potential

Observed

HTTP 500 after checkout submission

Expected

Successful checkout response

services/payments/checkout.tsPR #1842
  const discount = await applyCode(cart, code);
- const total = cart.subtotal - discount.amount;+ const total = cart.subtotal - discount.value;  return payments.charge({ total, currency });

AI explanation · The checkout request failed after the payment submission step. The changed checkout handler is a candidate for investigation, but additional logs and a reproduction are required to confirm root cause.

One platform. Complete coverage.

Everything your team needs to test critical journeys.

“A signed-in user can apply a valid discount code and see the reduced total before paying.”

  1. 1 · sign in as test user
  2. 2 · add product to cart
  3. 3 · apply code SAVE20
  4. 4 · assert total reduced 20%

AI Test Generation

Turn supported requirements, user stories, and application workflows into structured test scenarios that teams can review and execute.

shop.acme.test/checkout

Autonomous Browser Testing

Automate user interactions across configured browser environments, including navigation, form input, assertions, and evidence collection.

GET /api/orders/1042
200 OK · schema ✓
{ "id": 1042, "status": "paid" }

API Testing

Validate endpoints, response codes, schemas, authentication, negative cases, and chained API workflows.

- getByTestId("btn-pay")
+ getByRole("button", { name: "Pay" })
proposal · requires review

Test Maintenance

Identify broken selectors and outdated assumptions, suggest appropriate test updates, and preserve visibility into genuine regressions.

PR #1842 · 3 files
→ checkout.spec (4)
→ discount.spec (2)

Pull Request Intelligence

Use available code-change information to identify affected areas, prioritize relevant tests, and summarize potential release risks.

PASSED

42

FAILED

3

INVESTIGATE

2

ASSESSMENT · SAMPLE

Review recommended

Release Intelligence

Bring test results, failures, coverage information, execution history, and unresolved risks into one decision-ready view.

Pull request testing

Test the changes that matter.

Connect code changes to testing decisions. Identify potentially affected features, prioritize relevant scenarios, and provide actionable results directly within the development workflow.

Explore integrations
pull request · checks
Demonstration data

PR #1842 — Checkout improvements

feature/checkout-improvements → main

Changed files

  • services/payments/checkout.ts
  • components/CheckoutForm.tsx
  • tests/checkout.spec.ts

Potentially affected areas

Checkout submissionDiscount validationPayment error handling

Test selection

  • Checkout happy pathPassed
  • Invalid discountPassed
  • Payment failure handlingInvestigate
  • Order confirmationPassed

Release assessment

  • • 3 selected tests passed
  • • One test requires investigation
  • • Affected area: checkout
  • • Review diagnostic evidence before release

Release confidence

Know what passed. Investigate what didn't.

Bring execution results and relevant evidence together so teams can make informed release decisions.

release/2026.10 · BUILD-1042
Illustrative release report

Passed

42

Failed

3

Investigate

2

Duration

14m 08s

Test groups

  • Checkout8/11
  • Authentication9/9
  • Account management7/8
  • API contracts10/11
  • Core user journeys8/8

Release assessment

Review recommended

Some checks remain unresolved. Review the failures and available evidence before making a release decision.

A pass rate alone never marks a release as safe.

Recent execution history

  • BUILD-1042Review
  • BUILD-1041Reviewed
  • BUILD-1040Reviewed
  • BUILD-1039Reviewed
Discuss release reporting

Built for trusted test operations

Control how your tests run and what they can access.

Testing workflows may involve source code, credentials, application data, and production-critical logic. Security controls should be part of the platform design from the beginning.

Access control

Design role-based access and workspace permissions appropriate to the deployment model.

Design principle

Credential handling

Use managed secrets and controlled access for test credentials. Avoid exposing credentials in logs, screenshots, and generated reports.

Design principle

Environment isolation

Separate test environments, control execution permissions, and minimize the risk of unintended changes to live systems.

Design principle

Auditability

Maintain traceable records of test execution, approved changes, and relevant administrative actions.

Design principle

Human oversight stays in the loop.

Test repairs, environment changes, and release decisions should have appropriate approval controls. Proposed changes are reviewable, attributable, and never applied to application code.

Discuss your security requirements

How it works

From your first test to continuous verification.

STEP 1

Connect

Configure an application, testing environment, and supported development workflow.

STEP 2

Define

Describe the critical journeys you want to validate and review the generated test scenarios.

STEP 3

Verify

Execute tests, inspect evidence, investigate failures, and integrate the results into your release process.

Application and code changes
Test planning
Test execution
Failure investigation
Verification report

See BXVTech against your own workflow.

Walk us through how your team tests today. We'll show where AI-assisted test engineering could fit.